ROLE, AUDIENCE, FORMAT, AND TOPIC (RAFT) STRATEGY TO ENHANCE EFL LEARNERS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING: A STUDY IN AN INDONESIAN MADRASAH

  • Kiki Patmala Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • St. Hartina Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia
  • Wisran Wisran Tarbiyah and Teacher Training Faculty, Universitas Islam Negeri Palopo, Indonesia https://orcid.org/0009-0007-9265-603X
Keywords: RAFT, Writing Ability, Descriptive Text, EFL Learners

Abstract

Writing remains one of the most demanding skills for English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners, particularly in producing descriptive texts that require lexical variety, grammatical accuracy, and mechanical precision. Traditional approaches in Indonesian classrooms often emphasize form-focused drills and teacher-centered instruction, which may limit students’ engagement and creativity. This study investigates the effectiveness of the Role–Audience–Format–Topic (RAFT) strategy in enhancing senior secondary students’ descriptive writing performance. A quasi-experimental design was employed with 48 twelfth-grade students from MA Batusitanduk, divided into an experimental group taught using RAFT (n = 24) and a control group taught through conventional methods (n = 24). Both groups completed a pre-test and post-test assessed on vocabulary, grammar, and mechanics using a validated analytic rubric. Results revealed that the experimental group achieved a significantly higher mean post-test score (M = 72.33) than the control group (M = 65.33), t(46) = -5.432, p < .001, with a large effect size (Cohen’s d = 1.52, 95% CI [8.32, 15.02]). These findings confirm that RAFT effectively scaffolds planning and audience awareness, leading to substantial improvement in descriptive writing. The study offers theoretical implications for integrating cognitive and genre-based pedagogy, and practical recommendations for EFL teachers seeking to promote meaningful and engaging writing instruction in secondary education.

References

Brown, H. D. (2007). Principles of language learning and teaching (5th ed.). Pearson Longman.

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE.

Fajriyah, N. (2022). Challenges faced by students in writing descriptive text. ELTIN Journal, 10(1), 77–88. https://doi.org/10.22460/eltin.v10i1.4828

Fitriani, A. (2023). Students’ difficulties in writing descriptive text. Langue: Journal of Linguistics and Language Education, 6(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.52266/langue.v6i2.25368

Flower, L., & Hayes, J. R. (1981). A cognitive process theory of writing. College Composition and Communication, 32(4), 365–387. https://doi.org/10.2307/356600

Graham, S. (2023). The science of writing and its development: Implications for writing instruction. Educational Psychologist, 58(2), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520.2023.2175786

Graham, S., Liu, X., Bartlett, B., Ng, C., & Harris, K. R. (2018). Meta-analysis of writing instruction for secondary students. Review of Educational Research, 88(6), 907–945. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654318756265

Hidayati, N., & Suarnajaya, W. (2021). Improving students’ writing ability through RAFT strategy. Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 5(3), 202–210. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v5i3.35708

Hyland, K. (2019). Second language writing (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Landis, J. R., & Koch, G. G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Putri, R. (2023). Students’ perception of RAFT strategy in writing class. JELLT: Journal of English Language Learning and Teaching, 7(2), 112–120. https://doi.org/10.55737/jellt.v7i2.342

Rahmasari, A., & Rifa’i, S. (2022). The strength of RAFT strategy with Google Classroom in teaching writing. JDR: Journal of Development Research, 6(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.28926/jdr.v6i2.258

Sam Hermansyah, & Ahmad Rizal Majid. (2025). The Use of Probing-Prompting Technique to Improve Reading Comprehension of Eighth Grade Students. INTERACTION: Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa, 12(1), 543–556. https://doi.org/10.36232/interactionjournal.v12i1.2660

Seliem, S. I. M., Mohamed, M. F., & Ali, R. M. I. (2020). The effect of RAFT strategy on developing EFL creative writing skills. Journal of Studies in Education, 10(2), 87–104. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v10i2.16727

Zhang, Y., & Guo, Y. (2024). Metacognitive strategy instruction and its effects on EFL writing. SAGE Open, 14(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244024125708

Published
2025-09-19
How to Cite
Patmala, K., Hartina, S., & Wisran, W. (2025). ROLE, AUDIENCE, FORMAT, AND TOPIC (RAFT) STRATEGY TO ENHANCE EFL LEARNERS’ DESCRIPTIVE WRITING: A STUDY IN AN INDONESIAN MADRASAH. La Ogi : English Language Journal, 11(2), 153-163. https://doi.org/10.55678/loj.v11i2.2351
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.