DEVELOPMENT AND POTENTIAL OF SOYBEAN (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) IN BANJARNEGARA REGENCY

  • Alfassabiq Khairi Universitas Teknologi Sumbawa https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3425-1399
  • Salwa Ramadina Putri Utari Universitas Teknologi Sumbawa
  • Faizatuz Zulfa Institut Pertanian Bogor
  • Ayu Purnamasari Universitas Gadjah Mada
Keywords: Agricultural Ecology, Food Safety, Food Security, Soybeans, Sustainable Agriculture

Abstract

Soybean (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) is a highly nutritious legume that is rich in protein, iron, and calcium. Soybeans are an excellent source of vegetable nutrition for the human body and contain nutrients such as carbohydrates (20–30%), lipids (19%), essential fatty acids, phosphorus, iron, calcium, zinc, thiamine, riboflavin, vitamin E (tocopherol), dietary fiber (16%), and sugar. The potential for developing agricultural products has the potential to increase, marked by increased consumer demand which is soybean that has the potential to be developed due to production development in Banjarnegara Regency increasing annually. The research aims to determine the potential for developing soybeans in Banjarnegara Regency through historical data on plant cultivation. This research was carried out in September–October 2023. The research method used was qualitative research. This research data is secondary data obtained through the Central Statistics Agency (BPS) website and the Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database (FAOSTAT). The data obtained were analyzed using Pearson’s correlation analysis and simple regression at the 95% level. Furthermore, data forecasting analysis (forecasting) was also carried out to determine soybean productivity in 2023. The data was analyzed and displayed in graphical form using the Minitab v.21.4 application, while the data was displayed in tabular form using Microsoft Excel 2019. The conclusion is the development of soybean plants in the Regency Banjarnegara can be stable and increase every year, this needs to be maintained through local government policies, agricultural services, and researchers at institutions/universities to maintain the stability of soybean production and food security in the present and future.

References

Badan Pusat Statistik [BPS]. (2023). Produksi, luas lahan dan produktivitas tanaman kedelai di Kabupaten Banjarnegara. https://banjarnegarakab.bps.go.id/. [10 November 2023].

Bonny, S. (2008). Genetically modified glyphosate-tolerant soybean in the USA: adoption factors, impacts and prospects. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 28, 21-32. https://doi.org/10.1051/agro:2007044

Bueno, A.D.F., Panizzi, A.R., Hunt, T.E., Dourado, P.M., Pitta, R.M., & Gonçalves, J. (2021). Challenges for adoption of integrated pest management (IPM): the soybean example. Neotropical Entomology, 50(1), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13744-020-00792-9

Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2018). Farm income and production impacts of using GM crop technology 1996–2016. GM Crops & Food, 9(2), 59–89. https://doi.org/10.1080/21645698.2018.1464866

Chen, K.I., Erh, M.H., Su, N.W., Liu, W.H., Chou, C.C., & Cheng, K.C. (2012). Soyfoods and soybean products: from traditional use to modern applications. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, 96(1), 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4330-7

Dilawari, R., Kaur, N., Priyadarshi, N., Prakash, I., Patra, A., Mehta, S., Singh, B., Jain, P., & Islam, Md.A. (2022). Soybean: A key player for global food security. In Soybean Improvement: Physiological, Molecular and Genetic Perspectives (pp. 1–46). Cham: Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-12232-3_1

Egli, D.B., & Hatfield, J.L. (2014). Yield gaps and yield relationships in central US soybean production systems. Agronomy Journal, 106(2), 560–566. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj2013.0364

Fischer, R.A. (2015). Definitions and determination of crop yield, yield gaps, and of rates of change. Field Crops Research, 182, 9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2014.12.006

Food and Agriculture Organization Corporate Statistical Database [FAOSTAT]. (2023). Food and agriculture data. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/. [10 November 2023].

Hasan, N., Suryani, E., & Hendrawan, R. (2015). Analysis of soybean production and demand to develop strategic policy of food self sufficiency: a system dynamics framework. Procedia Computer Science, 72, 605-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2015.12.169

Huang, M., Wang, Q., Zhang, M., & Zhu, Q. (2014). Prediction of colour and moisture content for vegetable soybean during drying using hyper spectral imaging technology. Journal of Food Engineering, 128, 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2013.12.008

Khairi, A., Murti, R.H., Irwan, S.N.R., & Putra, E.T.S. (2022). Postharvest losses of NOR tomato fruit line MA 131-6-3 treated by ethephon and calcium carbide. Jurnal Agronomi Indonesia, 50(3), 315–321. https://doi.org/10.24831/jai.v50i3.41273

Khairi, A., Jayaputra, Padusung, Tejowulan, S., & Nurrachman. (2023). Combination of bio-organo-mineral fertilizers on optimizing the growth and production of tomatoes (Solanum lycopersicum L.) in dryland environment. Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian, 20(2), 127–138. https://doi.org/10.31849/jip.v20i2.10901

Khairi, A., Murti, R.H., Irwan, S.N.R., & Putra, E.T.S. (2023). Physicochemical properties in NOR tomato line MA 131-6-3 after treated with ethephon and calcium carbide induced ripening. Biodiversitas, 24(5), 3029–3037. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d240558

Krishnan, H.B. (2008). Improving the sulfur‐containing amino acids of soybean to enhance its nutritional value in animal feed. Sulfur: a missing link between soils, crops, and nutrition, 50, 235–249. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronmonogr50.c15

Leguizamón, A. (2017). Disappearing nature? Agribusiness, biotechnology and distance in Argentine soybean production. In soy, globalization, and environmental politics in South America (pp. 63–80). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2016.1140647

Lovabyta, N.S., Jayus, J., & Nugraha, A.S. (2020). Bioconversion of isoflavones glycoside to aglycone during edamame (Glycine max) soygurt production using Streptococcus thermophillus FNCC40, Lactobacillus delbrueckii FNCC41, and L. plantarum FNCC26. Biodiversitas, 21(4), 1358–1364. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210412

Maciel, V.G., Zortea, R.B., Menezes da Silva, W., Fernando de Abreu Cybis, L., Einloft, S., & Seferin, M. (2015). Life Cycle Inventory for the agricultural stages of soybean production in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 93, 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.016

Mahama, A., Awuni, J. A., Mabe, F. N., & Azumah, S. B. (2020). Modelling adoption intensity of improved soybean production technologies in Ghana-a Generalized Poisson approach. Heliyon, 6(3). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03543

Martins-Salles, S., Machado, V., Massochin-Pinto, L., & Fiuza, L.M. (2017). Genetically modified soybean expressing insecticidal protein (Cry1Ac): management risk and perspectives. FACETS, 2(1), 496–512. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2017-0006

Nair, R.M., Boddepalli, V.N., Yan, M.-R., Kumar, V., Gill, B., Pan, R.S., Wang, C., Hartman, G.L., Silva e Souza, R., & Somta, P. (2023). Global status of vegetable soybean. Plants, 12, 609. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants12030609

Ningrum, I.H., Irianto, H., & Riptanti, E.W. (2018). Analysis of soybean production and import trends and its import factors in Indonesia. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 142(1), 012059. https://doi.org.10.1088/1755-1315/142/1/012059

Pagano, M.C., & Miransari, M. (2016). The importance of soybean production worldwide. In Abiotic and biotic stresses in soybean production (pp. 1–26). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801536-0.00001-3

Purnamasari, A., & Haryanto, H. (2023). Diversity of stored-product beetles at the rice warehouses in Mataram City and Central Lombok Regency, Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Pertanian, 20(1), 9–16. https://doi.org/10.31849/jip.v20i1.10879

Purnamasari, A., Hadi, S., & Suputa. (2023). Acoustic playback stimulus experiment to study mating behavioral responses of Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett (Diptera: Tephritidae). AGRIVITA Journal of Agricultural Science, 44(3), 500–512. https://doi.org/10.17503/agrivita.v44i3.3789

Rigo, A.A., Dahmer, A.M., Steffens, C., Steffens, J., & Carrão-Panizzi, M.C. (2015). Characterization of soybean cultivars genetically improved for human consumption. International Journal of Food Engineering, 1(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijfe.1.1.1-7

Selvanathan, M., Jayabalan, N., Saini, G.K., Supramania, M., & Hussin, N. (2020). Employee productivity in Malaysian private higher educational institutions. Palarch’s Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(3), 66–79. https://doi.org/10.48080/jae.v17i3.50

Soni, K., Frew, R., & Kebede, B. (2023). A review of conventional and rapid analytical techniques coupled with multivariate analysis for origin traceability of soybean. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2023.2171961

Toloi, M. N. V., Bonilla, S. H., Toloi, R. C., Silva, H. R. O., & Nääs, I. D. A. (2021). Development indicators and soybean production in Brazil. Agriculture, 11(11), 1164. https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture11111164

Wu, Y., Wang, E., Gong, W., Xu, L., Zhao, Z., He, D., Yang, F., Wang, X., Yong, T., Liu, J., Pu, T., Yan, Y., & Yang, W. (2023). Soybean yield variations and the potential of intercropping to increase production in China. Field Crops Research, 291, 108771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2022.108771

Published
2023-12-24
How to Cite
Khairi, A., Utari, S. R., Zulfa, F., & Purnamasari, A. (2023). DEVELOPMENT AND POTENTIAL OF SOYBEAN (Glycine max (L.) Merrill) IN BANJARNEGARA REGENCY. Jurnal Sains Agribisnis, 3(2), 92-101. https://doi.org/10.55678/jsa.v3i2.1265
Section
Articles