Investigating Lexical And Syntactic Ambiguity On Native Facebook Celebritism

Investigating Lexical And Syntactic Ambiguity On Native Facebook Celebritism

  • juliana juliana Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Nadirah Nadirah Muhammadiyah University of Sidenreng Rappang
  • Lababa Lababa Muhammadiyah University of Sidenreng Rappang
  • Ibrahim Manda Muhammadiyah University of Sidenreng Rappang
Keywords: Investigating Lexical, Syntactic Ambiguity, Native Facebook Celebritism

Abstract

The objectives of the research are to know why do many readers not understand about the meaning of the facebook post by native facebook celebritism and to find out the types of ambiguity and dominant type of lexical and syntactical ambiguity use in Facebook Post by native facebook celebritism.In this research, researcher applied desriptive qualitative method. Qualitative research, like other types of research, is descriptive, with data collected in the form of words or images rather than numbers. Choosing, reading, and underlining were the methods used to collect data. Identifying, classifying, analyzing, calculating, and interpreting the data were all used to analyze the data. Homonymy, polysemy, synonymy, and antonymy were among the linguistic ambiguities. Surface structure ambiguity and deep structure ambiguity were the two types of syntactical ambiguity.

References

Britton, B. K. (1978). Lexical ambiguity of words used in english text. Behavior Research Methods &

Instrumentation, 10 (1), 1–7.

Bucaria, C. (2004). Lexical and syntactic ambiguity as a source of humor. 7–3, 279–309.

https://doi.org/10.1515/HUMR.2004.013

Chandra, A. (2019). Ambiguitas pada Judul Artikel Surat Kabar Tempo. Skripsi.

Charina, I.N., Dharma, S., Rayner, Giora, Gorfein, Laurian, & L. (2018). LEXICAL AND SYNTACTIC AMBIGUITY IN

HUMOR. International Journal of Humanity Studies, 1, 120–131.

https://doi.org/10.24071/ijhs.2017.010113

Dharmayanti, G, Ketut., and Gede. 2017. Lexical ambiguity in English Advertisement Slogans of Unilever

Products. Journal Humanis, 19 (1).

Dussias, P. E. (2003). Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution in L2 Learners. Studies in Second Language Acquisition,

(4), 529–557.

https://doi.org/10.1017/s0272263103000238

Elmawati, D. (n.d.). Structural Ambiguity in the Headlines Compiled by Department of Languages , Cultures and

Linguistics Bucknell University : A Study on the X-bar Theory. 1–8.

Fayyadh, H. M., Zurif, E., Swinney, D., & Garrett, M. (2018). Syntactic Ambiguity in Newspaper Headlines. March

, 1–29.

Fera, A. (2019). March , 2019 LEXICAL AMBIGUITY COMPARED TO SYNTACTIC / OR STRUCTURAL AMBIGUITY

Ardian Fera. 30, 1113–1116.

Finch, G. (2003). Beginning Linguistics. How to Study Linguistics, 1–11.

Griffith, P. 2006. An Introduction to English Semantics and Pragmatics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press

Ltd.

Journal, I., & Studies, H. (2017). International Journal of Humanity Studies http://e-

journal.usd.ac.id/index.php/IJHS Sanata Dharma University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia. 1(1), 120–131.

Published
2022-01-13
How to Cite
juliana, juliana, Nadirah, N., Lababa, L., & Manda, I. (2022). Investigating Lexical And Syntactic Ambiguity On Native Facebook Celebritism. La Ogi : English Language Journal, 8(1), 40-47. https://doi.org/10.55678/loj.v8i1.588
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.