THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SEMANTIC MAPPING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS VOCABULARY MASTERY

  • Nur Fitriani Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Nadirah Usman Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Andi Asrifan Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Tadjuddin posi Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
  • Sam hermansyah . Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidenreng Rappang
Keywords: implementation, semantic mapping, vocabulary mastery

Abstract

The objective of the research was to find out whether or not semantic mapping can improve the ability of the students of  SMP Negeri 2 Kulo in vocabulary. This research employed the method of the research was pre experimental method design. The population was the second year students of SMP Negeri 2 Kuloin 2018-2019 academic years. Total number of population was 20 students and one class was taken as sample (VIII.1) by using clustersampling technique, total munber of sample was 20. The instrument used in this research was to vocabulary test. The result of this research showed that in pre-test the mean score (43.15) is lower than post-test (58.50). It proved that there was significant improvement of students’ vocabualry using semantic mapping. The result of the P-value (0.000) was lower than level of significant  (alpha (α)=0.05). This means that H1 was accepted. The researcher concluded that teaching vocabulary mastery by using SEMANTIC MAPPING  improved the students’  vocabulary mastery  at SMP Negeri 2 Kulo.

References

Arikuto, Suharsimi. 1993. Procedure Penelitian. Edisi Revisi; Cet IX; Jakarta: PT. Rineka Cipta.

Balci Ozgul. 2011. Teaching Vocabulary Through Collacations in EFL Class. Turkey University.

Beare, Kenneth. 1997. How to Improve Your Vocabulary. Retrieved on 22nd June (2009) from http://esl.about.com/od/engilshvocabulary/ht/ htvocab.htm.

Depdikbud. 2005. Garis-Garis Besar Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris. Jakarta: Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.

Elnaz Shoari. 2014. Te Effect of Graphic Organizer Strategy on Improving Vocabulary Learning. Tabriz University.

Evelyin Hatch and Cherryl Brown. 1995. Vocabulary, Semantic, and Languange Education. Cambridge. Cambridge Univercity.

Gay, L. R., et al. 2006. Educational Research Competencies for Analysis and Applications: Eight Edition. Columbus Ohio. Pearson Merril Prentice Hall.

Geer, David. 2000. How to improve your vocabulary. Retrieved on 23rd June (2009) from http://www.wordhacker.com/en/article/howtoimprove vocabulary.htm.

Hadi, Sutrisno. 1976. Methodology Research. Cet.II, Yogyakarta: Yayasan Penerbit Fafultas Psikology UGM.

Hariany. 2008. The Application of Personal Vocabulary Notes (PVN) Technique to Develop Students’ Vocabulary at the Second Year of SMA Muhammadiyah Kalosi Enrekang. Thesis UIN MAkassar.

Harmer, Jeremy. 1991. The Practice of English Language Teaching. London: Longman Group.

Hornby, A.S. 1986. Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press.

Hornby, A.S. 1995. Oxford Advance Learner’s Dictionary of Current English. London: Oxford University Press

Lado, Robert. 1988. Teaching English Across Culture. USA: McGraw-Hill.

Merdarwati. 1887. Teaching Vocabulary Integrated Skills Approach. Thesis of FBS IKIP Ujung Pandang.

Mariana Celce Muria. 2001. Teaching English as a Second or Foreign LanguageTeaching. Heinle & Heinle Thomson Learning. USA

Mula. 2000. The Interest of the Second Year Students of Pondok Nahdlah Layang Makassar in Learning Vocabulary through English Games. Thesis of UNISMUH Makassar.

Noding. 2004. Building up English Vocabulary through Cartoon Film (A Study at the Second Year Students’ of PesantrenDarulArqamGambara). Thesis of UIN Alauddin Makassar.

Nurudin. 2002.Teaching VocabularyThrough Short Story.Jakarta. UIN Jakarta

Rita. 1994. Buiding up Vocabulary through Eliciting Technique. IKIP Makassar: Thesis FPBS.

Robert. 2006. The Handbook of Morphology. (online) Available: http//WWW. Handbook of Morphology. Htm. Accessed: 1 juli 2009.

Schail, William. 1967. Seven Days to Faster Reading. New York: Paper Back Library.

Suhardi. 2008. Pengaruh Kreativitas Guru Terhadap Peningkatan Hasil Belajar Fisika Siswa Kelas VII Mts Patalassang Kec. Sinjai Timur Kab. Sinjai. Makassar: Tarbiyah and Teaching Faculty of UIN Alauddin Makassar.

Sugiyono. 2007. MetodePenelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Tricia Hedge. 2001. Oxford Handbooks for Language Teacher.Oxford. University Press

Webster, Noah. 1983. Webster Twenty Century of English Language. New York: Simon and Sthucher.

Elnaz Shoari. 2014. Te Effect of Graphic Organizer Strategy on Improving Vocabulary Learning. Tabriz University.

Wiwat Orawiwatnakul. 2013. Cross Word Puzzles as a Plearning tool for Vocubulary Development. Bangkok University.

Yakin, Handra. 2008. The Application of Total Physical Response to Improve the Vocabulary Achievement of the Second Year Students of Junior High Islamic Boarding School UmmulMukminin. Thesis of UIN MAkassar.

Yaumi, M. 1992. English Vocabulary, Cet. 1. Bandung: CV. Pioner Bandung.

Published
2022-06-24
How to Cite
Fitriani, N., Usman, N., Asrifan, A., posi, T., & ., S. (2022). THE IMPLEMENTATION OF SEMANTIC MAPPING TO IMPROVE STUDENTS VOCABULARY MASTERY. La Ogi : English Language Journal, 8(2), 150-155. https://doi.org/10.55678/loj.v8i2.686
Section
Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.