The submitted article manuscript will undergo an initial review by the editor. If the content aligns with the journal's focus and the manuscript structure complies with the writing format, the article will be sent to reviewers for peer review. The review process involves two reviewers, selected based on their areas of expertise. After the first reviewer completes their review, the manuscript will be returned to the author for revision. If the author's revisions are not approved by the reviewer, the editor will return the manuscript to the author for further improvement within a specified timeframe. Once the first reviewer approves the manuscript, it will then be reviewed by the second reviewer. If the manuscript requires further revision after being reviewed, it will be sent back to the author for corrections and resubmission. After the second review process is completed, the manuscript will proceed to a similarity check (plagiarism check) conducted by the JIKAN journal editorial team. The acceptable similarity threshold for manuscripts is ≤30%. Subsequently, if the manuscript meets the requirements (similarity ≤30%), it will proceed to the next stage for publication.